The Weather was wonderful. Saturday started great, good crowd lots of interest, people talking about the big ones. This has been one of my favorite shows since 1981. By Sunday some artists did well others not so good. Jewelers and some woodworkers were happy. Me? Add this year of dismal sales to the last few for this show. Why? Previously there was a local’s patron buying program that was apparently discontinued; usually I went home with a few of those, so that is one difference. I seldom get to view a show, so took a little time to see what was in the booths around me this year. I would have to say not enforcing the show rules could be the big culprit in my dwindling paycheck. I choose the shows I apply to by the rules as stated in the show prospectus. It says you must not have more than ten linear feet of "FRAMED" reproductions hanging and the total number of reproductions may not exceed 50% of everything you have. As a Painter with only original paintings it's hard to compete with unlimited numbers of inexpensive Reproductions. The Reproductions were supposed to be clearly marked as such. WOW, if anyone was asked to leave because they were in violation of the rules I didn't hear about it. One painter had ONE original in their whole booth, and freely admitted it. Everything else was marked Print, not Reproduction. Another had four originals total, of work that appeared to be old and a booth and a half space filled with Giclee. Another oil painter had ALL walls filled with perhaps a few framed originals and massive numbers of uneditioned, unmarked, Reproductions. Every wall of his booth had unframed reproductions hung. These kinds of violations need to be addressed by the committee, find some knowledgeable people to police and enforce your rules. I realize the show director is busy putting out fires during a show but a volunteer could easily observe the violations I noted. Based on earlier blogs, the volunteer would need to check each day as there are cheaters who find it good business to change out their display after judging or the review committee has walked through. If the director doesn't want to take the heat of removing rule breakers after asking for compliance use the committee to do it. Rules are rules.
Speaking of Editioning, this show doesn't require it. Just the labeling of Reproductions as Reproductions as I mentioned unenforced. I realize there are different theories about how it's done and that the editioning of Photography started as a marketing ploy but surly there are "some" standards. I've seen this in "Painters" booths also so the following practice is not unique to photographers. You see an image, it is numbered and editioned, and then you see the image in a different size. It again is numbered and editioned; you realize the editions have different edition sizes. What? Then you go on to see smaller versions same image, 10x12, 8x10, 5x7 same title, no editioning at all. Apparently once you get below a certain size it doesn't count? Give me a break. This is wrong. Shows should protect their reputations and the public by not allowing unscrupulous practices. Either it's editioned (set number) or it's an open edition. When art is editioned, the customer anticipates that their copy represents one example of the total number. Changing the size, hand coloring, adding extra paint does not constitute a separate new edition it constitutes a variation within the edition. Painting on a reproduction does not make it original, it is a hand colored reproduction. The traditional usage of A/P (artists proof), and P/P (printers proof) have to do with the printing process. These are prints that are pulled as the colors are being adjusted to get the artists desired outcome, “under the supervision of the artist.” Generally they do not exactly match the approved edition. Publishers have subverted that practice, to give the artist a few (god knows how many now) prints of his own in addition to the "Editioned" prints the publisher has been authorized to pull and sell.