Inspired by many calls and by the post- Can the System be Improved, (Thank you R. C. Fulwiler) I would like to start a new thread exploring ideas of how to create that improvement. My proposal is that we generate some ideas and then ask the National Association of independent artists (NAIA) to help champion it.
As a starting point, can we assume that artists would like the following from the jury process-
1) Criteria- You want to know what you are being judged on.
2) Process- You want to know who is judging your work and how.
3) Numbers- How many slots are open for how many categories.
4) Results- Specific comments so as to be able to make decisions going forward.
Other desires?
While each sounds simple, they also each have issues.
Criteria- reminds me of the Supreme Court Judge who stated "I can't define what is obscene but I know it when I see it". Stated criteria needs to be just as flexible or we would never see anything new at the shows. It can be simplified. A statement like- our jurors will judge your work based on: Technique, creativity, and originality tells you what they are looking for without giving you any information. Artists do you have examples of how this has been done well?
Process- Of the above, this is the most likely to be public in my experience. Projected, monitors, three jurors, score of one to five, yes, no, maybe... Not so hard to let artists know the system and, while you may not agree that a monitor is acceptable, at least you know what is expected.
Numbers- If there are a particular number of slots open in a medium that information could be useful. A show cannot let you know how many applications will be received but could give historical information. Predicting the future changes the future. If I tell you that I have ten slots for photo and generally get 40 applicants you may not apply. I might end up having to select from fifteen applicants suddenly and miss out on having your work in my show. Any ideas of how to make this fair?
Results- Not every artist really wants to know the jurors comments. Many say they do, but then argue each point. I try to be clear, but after I get attacked a few times for my jurors subjective opinions it is tempting to go back to generalizations. Movie line "You cant handle the truth". How am I handling this now- The notifications go out with general comments. If artists want they can call me and I will let them know what the jurors comments were. I start with the safer things- "Um, your booth shot was out of focus". If you prove to me that you want to hear I will continue going and discussing for as long as it takes to be helpful. If you instead start arguing with me it will be a very short conversation. Zapp just added an option to share juror feedback with the artists. Let's see if that helps.
Please, let's hear some more stories and maybe together we can change the systems.











