Signing and matting prints

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Larry Berman on January 9, 2010 at 4:58pm

You don't say what your medium is or whether you're referring to reproductions. Photography is traditionally signed in pencil on the mat. And when I sell unmatted photographs from my web sites, I sign the prints on the back. But if you're working with a gallery that's doing well for you, I'd do what they want with what you put with them. Art shows are different and it's unknown how the public will take to what the gallery wants.

Larry Berman
Digital Jury Services
http://BermanGraphics.com
412-401-8100

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by David Hipwell on January 9, 2010 at 6:41pm

Larry ...first thank you for responding....First of all I paint acrylic on canvas.....or course the prints I am referring to are paper......and I am referring solely to paper prints which are of course, reproductions....I do respect this gallery owner a lot.....but I want input from other gallery owners and artists....and since you brought it up....what do you other artists thing the public will do at an art show if art prints are signed with gold or silver ink on the ink of the print instead of in pencil in the white border below the ink portion of the print.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Larry Berman on January 9, 2010 at 6:46pm

From a photographer's perspective, I've never signed in the image area, only on the mat. But I do know photographers that leave a border at the bottom for the signature and number. And I'm sure there are some that sign the image itself but I've never cared for the way that looks.

You do need artists in other mediums (than photography) to answer.

Larry Berman
Digital Jury Services
http://BermanGraphics.com
412-401-8100

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tim Wilson on January 11, 2010 at 9:52am

The only issue I see with signing the mat & not the image..what if the buyer decides to replace the mat at a later date...no more signature...and if they later sell that piece then the new buyer wont know who did it..

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Linda Anderson on January 11, 2010 at 1:09pm

I am a photographer. I always place my signature on my work - the photo itself. I typically use a white acid free gel pen in either of the bottom corners. I keep it small and unobtrusive. The few times I have a white or light area in those corners I use a darker acid free gel pen. I do the same with my artwork printed on canvas. While I am not "famous", I do have a following in the midwest and have received feedback that some have noticed my signature and have commented "Oh, that's a Linda Anderson - I have her work too"
Signature is important William.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by MICHAEL ALAN STIPEK on January 12, 2010 at 6:54pm

Photographers have one problem if they have their images on photographic or emulsion/resin coated (RC) paper: any pen or pencil that you sign on the image will eventually etch its way through the emulsion and cause the edges to curl back. It's a form of reticulation. It's best to sign on the mat, in pencil. If a gallery, frameshop or customer wants to remove the mat, just have your name and ph. number or email address on the back of the matted image and that person or persons can contact you to work with you on another signature placement.

For painters' reproductions, whether numbered or just signed, on any form of paper, whether an Arches 300# or just plain printer paper from your home computer, you can sign either on the mat, if you have one, or print a white space below the image and sign/number that. That has been the practice of reproductions by watercolorists for many decades.

If you don't have any kind of border or mat and frame the print to the edges, I suggest signing the back of the framed image. However, if you have a canvas mounted reproduction (giclee' is the same thing) or a laminated/coated image, you can sign the front, preferably small, but I suggest using an archival or gel pen so the ink doesn't eventually eat its way to the substrate. At least in your lifetime!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Linda Anderson on January 13, 2010 at 12:57am

Thanks Michael for this useful info. Best to you in 2010!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tim Wilson on January 13, 2010 at 8:43am

William, you just pointed out where I was thinking of going with my post without me having to go there. lol
"What is the signature alone worth? Unless its the signature of someone famous, like Abraham Lincoln, its not worth anything" Then why worry about signing it at all...Not trying to be a S.A. but in all honesty, what is your signature worth to the final product.

Now, on the other hand, those who became famous for their work didnt start off that way and most if not all of their work is signed on the image itself...if my memory serves me well. (I hope)

William S. Eickhorst said:

Tim:

The purchaser is buying the work, not the signature. What is the signature alone worth? Unless its the signature of someone famous, like Abraham Lincoln, its not worth anything. If its that important to have a signature, the artist can always sign the back of the work - then if if gets rematted someday the owner still has the signature or can tell who did the work.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by John Tunney on March 1, 2010 at 11:35am

I'm a photographer and digital artist. I usually float my images in the mat, meaning I leave about a half inch space between the image and the mat all the way around. I think it looks great, sortof like double matting. I sign and number the image in the white space. I know that a lot of photographers sign the mat, but I figure there's never going to be much of a market for signed mats.

John

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Alison Thomas on March 2, 2010 at 5:39am

I do overkill for this. I sign and number the print istelf in the white portion which is then covered up by the mat. I sign and number the mat in pencil on the lower right. And I provide a COA with the print which tells the materials plus the title and number of the print. If someone remats a print they have the option of placing the mat so my signature is visible (or not).

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Alison Thomas on March 2, 2010 at 5:40am

I forgot to add that I sometimes get requests to sign the print itself so I carry a light and a dark acid free pen to shows for that purpose.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Michael Peychich on March 2, 2010 at 4:05pm

If your work is limited to one style only you may be recognized by your work, I believe that an artist need not be so restricted in artistic expression that someone looking at his or her work will automaticly know that the work is yours. I am not saying it is wrong to be limited in style if that style allows your to completely satisfy your artistic desires. I work with a verity of styles and would never expect that someone would recognize all the work as mine. If they did I would find it troubling. However I would hope that the quality would be high and that when they encounter an image of mine that they did not recognize as mine they would think its a great image I'm not surprised it was done by Michael. As for signature, I sign the matt but that to is a matter of artistic expression.

William S. Eickhorst said:

Linda:

I hate to be a stickler, but anything you attach to the image, including a signature, becomes part of the image. Did you compose the photograph with the signature as part of the composition? If viewers can't recognize your work without relying on a signature, no matter how small, what does that say about the work itself? What do you other photographers think?

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page